Boston magistrate accused of helping illegal immigrant flee ICE agents in 2018
A Trial-Like Hearing Set for June
A Massachusetts judge will soon face a public hearing over serious misconduct allegations. Judge Shelley Joseph is accused of helping a twice-deported illegal migrant escape her courtroom in 2018.
The hearing, scheduled for June 9, will resemble a courtroom trial. Her legal team will have a chance to present evidence. The Commission on Judicial Conduct will oversee the process.
Joseph allegedly allowed Jose Medina-Perez, a migrant with narcotics charges, to exit through a back door. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents were waiting with a detainer at the courthouse.

Original Charges Dropped, But Scrutiny Continues
In 2019, former U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling charged Joseph with obstruction of justice and conspiracy. The case made national headlines.
Joseph later surrendered. In response, federal prosecutors dropped the charges. The matter then moved to the state’s judicial oversight body.
The Commission formally charged her late last year. According to the Boston Herald, Joseph is accused of “willful judicial misconduct” and “failing to comply with the law.”
Legal and Ethical Questions Raised
At the center of the case is the judge’s role in enforcing — or evading — federal immigration law.
Critics argue Joseph acted unlawfully and undermined federal authority. Supporters claim she was protecting due process and judicial discretion.
Joseph’s lawyer, Thomas Hoopes, has not commented publicly. It is also unclear if she plans to settle before the hearing.
A Similar Case in Wisconsin
Just days ago, another judge found herself in a nearly identical situation.
Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested last Friday. She is accused of helping an illegal migrant avoid federal agents.

Prosecutors allege she obstructed justice by hiding Eduardo Flores-Ruiz. He had illegally re-entered the U.S. after a 2013 deportation. ICE eventually caught him after a foot chase outside the courthouse.
Suspension and Defense in Wisconsin
On Tuesday, the Wisconsin Supreme Court suspended Dugan while her case proceeds. Her legal team expressed disappointment with the court’s swift action.
They continue to defend her. “We assert Judge Dugan’s innocence and look forward to her vindication,” her lawyers said.
Public Trust on the Line
Both cases raise key concerns about judicial accountability. Can judges selectively cooperate with federal agencies?
Legal experts are watching closely. Many say the outcome could set important precedents for how courts handle immigration-related detainers.
Judge Joseph’s hearing in June may answer some of those questions. For now, both judges remain in legal limbo — and under heavy public scrutiny.
Our Visitor






